
Photo: CC/Danny Barron
Some readers of my Boston Globe column today caught a glitch (and a few of those got their knickers twisted) over my thoughts about the WaterMill, a device that sucks drinking water out of the air.
Here’s one very reasonable remark, from ““:
The WaterMill, although sounding like a good idea, costs $2,000 and takes 11.0 cents of energy to produce a gallon — up to three gallons per day.
I’m all for alternative energy sources, but Mark, do you really think this cool device “should take a bite out of the water bill for most families”?
via These retro phones won’t bust the budget – The Boston Globe
Touché. In my piece, I should have written, “bottled water costs.” But with the solar panel powering the WaterMill, which I do mention, you could theoretically begin making potable water for free.
I also understand that many people prefer the taste, the fluoride and the low costs they get with their municipal water supplies. They also trust the government more than themselves to provide clean water for their families.