Singularity watch: New technologies as likely to to enslave as liberate

We might not want to live forever (emphases, below, are mine). Libertarian author David Friedman appears to be arguing in a new book (which I will be reviewing in the coming weeks) that the future will be an adapt-or-die type thing:

David Friedman, author of such books as The Machinery of Freedom and Hidden Order: The Economics of Everyday Life, now looks at a variety of technological revolutions that might happen over the next few decades, their implications, and how to deal with them. Topics range from encryption and surveillance through biotechnology and nanotechnology to life extension, mind drugs, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence. One theme of the book is that the future is radically uncertain. Technological changes already begun could lead to more or less privacy than we have ever known, freedom or slavery, effective immortality or the elimination of our species, and radical changes in life, marriage, law, medicine, work, and play. “If it can be done, it will be done,” David Friedman has said. “So the interesting thing to me is not what should you stop but how do you adapt.” We do not know which future will arrive, but it is unlikely to be much like the past. It is worth starting to think about it now.

via Cato Institute: Future Imperfect: Technology and Freedom in an Uncertain World (Book Forum)

Behold the "living gel"

<a href=Robots will soon have guts, just like people, thanks to scientists at Waseda University.

The Waseda scientists have produced a gel that contracts like human intestines, and without any need for external stimulus.

If you place a small cylinder atop the gel, If a small cylindrical object is placed on the gel, reads the university’s announcement, “the wave motion of the gel causes it to roll forward—like a miniature conveyor belt.”

Robot "skin jobs" in the works

<a href=Japanese scientists say they’ve developed a fully-flexible, and stretchable, conductive skin for robots with carbon nantubes.

U.S. scientists this week also announced they have made a flexible material that might make an excellent covering for artificial eyeballs.

Material bends, stretches and conducts electricity? | Technology | Reuters
They stretched the sheet of material to nearly double its original size and it snapped back into place, without disrupting the transistors or ruining the material’s conductive properties.

The elastic conductor would allow electronic circuits to be mounted in places that would have been impossible up to now, including “arbitrary curved surfaces and movable parts, such as the joints of a robot’s arm,” Sekitani and colleagues wrote.

"Brain on a plate" bosses robot

Scientists say they’ve cultivated a brain in the laboratory, which they’ve connected wirelessly to a robot.

The rat neurons, according to New Scientist, process sensor data from the robot’s sensors, and direct the machine to avoid obstacles. — mb

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-0eZytv6Qk]

Sociologists want your brain in cyberspace

Call them transhumanists, or extropians, or convergenists. Call their mission GNR, or NBIC, or “RL meets SL.” A new generation of social scientists, with religious zeal, are changing reality as we know it.


(A meeting of the minds, at “Convergence of the Real and the Virtual: The First Scientific Conference in World of Warcraft.” Image: from the Convergentsystems wiki)

by Mark Baard

Virtual worlders, led by a so-called “convergenist” from the National Science Foundation, met this week to discuss one of their plans for humankind: capturing individual personalities onto computers, and transmitting them into other worlds.

Rather than meeting in the real world, attendees at the Convergence of the Real and the Virtual conference brought their swords and leopards, and their idealized bodies (big muscles, big boobs) to a space in World of Warcraft, an online massively multiplayer online role playing game, or MMORPG.

The NSF sociologist who organized the WoW scientific meeting, William Sims Bainbridge [sic], has taken the form of a “level 65 (out of 70) blood elf priest” in the game, which claims more than nine million players.

Part of Bainbridge’s job, as director of the NSF’s Human-Centered Computing Cluster, is to direct young researchers into areas of “future research,” including “immersive and multi-sensory technologies, and direct brain-computer interfaces.”

For the WoW meeting, Bainbridge described how human consciousnesses might be uploaded to virtual worlds (at least in Battlestar Galactica, they call it “downloading”).

He also described how virtual humans might be made governable:

(Virtual world) participants are much less likely to be guided by religious belief, and more likely to prefer the suspension of disbelief associated with science fiction and fantasy. So, we can expect that virtual worlds will prototype many social innovations that might then diffuse to offline governance, while often preaching sedition.

Bainbridge spent some of his younger days in a Scientology splinter group, and is considered by some academics to be a religious expert.

But Bainbridge is also a religious hero, to the transhumanists, who hope to accelerate the convergence of real and virtual reality, as well as genetics, nanotechnology and robotics (Ray Kurzweil’s GNR).

In addition to recruiting its partnerships with the NSF, NASA and other governmental agencies, the extropians court Hollywood stars such as William Shatner, and academics at Yale and Oxford.

Some transhumanists call themselves extropians, others, convergenists. Some also use a different convergence acronym, NBIC, which represents nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science.

Like Scientologists, transhumanists appear to brook little dissent, and seem eager to silence their critics. When Bainbridge meets with Second Lifers in a few weeks, for example, he will be hosted by a group of transhumaniststoo busy building the future we want to spare time on unconstructive criticism.

That unconstructive criticism, say the transhumanists, is any that comes from those who do not “share our goals and values.”

Air Force sends up more Cylon Raiders

Robotic Predator drones are wreaking havoc on Iraqi and Afghani targets. U.S. homeland reconnaissance missions are also on the rise. And like Cylon raiders, while hardware might die, the brains live on–the drones’ human operators are safely ensconced in trailers, Stateside.

Predator combat air patrols double in 1 year
The Air Force plans to expand Predator training by standing up a second Predator training squadron and establish a Predator Weapons Instructor Course in early 2009. This action is necessary to lay the foundation to further increase and enhance joint warfighting capability.

For good or ill, robots set to kill

U.S. engineers are building unreliable, autonomous killing machines, a U.K. computer scientist said today. Terrorists will be making their own.

robart3e.jpgToo cute? Watch the DoD’s 12-year-old Robart III (left) knock down some Coke cans, here. The Army’ s more recent SWORDS robot (below, right) has made the rounds at auto and robotics shows. (Images: U.S. Department of Defense)

While Japanese researchers are building humanoid robots that will care for their aging population, the U.S. Department of Defense is developing autonomous weapons that will decide which humans to cut down.swords22004-12-03.jpg

But there’s a problem: Robots make lousy decision makers, said University of Sheffield professor Noel Sharkey, in a speech at the Royal United Services Institute in Whitehall.

“Current robots are dumb machines with very limited sensing capability,” said Sharkey, in a statement released yesterday. “What this means is that it is not possible to guarantee discrimination between combatants and innocents or a proportional use of force as required by the current Laws of War.”

Sharkey also predicted that terrorists are likely to replace suicide bombers with killer robots, which they can produce for only a few hundred pounds with off-the-shelf parts.

Some military officers argue that without any messy emotions to get in the way, autonomous weapons (AW) will make more efficient killers.

“AW can better discriminate targets and calculate the impacts of an engagement in real time to insure the impact is proportional to the military advantage gained,” writes U.S. Air Force Major Michael A. Guetlein, in a 2005 research paper (click here to download the PDF). “Emotions and adrenaline cease to affect the decision to engage. Instead, the decision becomes one of probabilities.”

Guetlein also predicts that “social conditioning” (his words) will eventually any public objections to giving robots a license to kill.

“Society is likely to welcome some aspects of AW,” Guetlein writes.

–mb

Notes: See my 2004 Wired article, “Robots May Fight for the Army.”

The DoD has been trying for years to turn soldiers into flesh-and-blood-based killing machines. See “The guilt-free soldier,” about emotion-deadening drugs, which my brother, Erik, wrote in 2003.

Your future caregiver: Robuter

Robuter home-centric robot

Originally uploaded by markbaard.

The French robotics firm Robosoft this week demonstrated a robotic aid for the elderly and physically and cognitively disabled.

The Robuter is a net-connected system that housebound individuals can use to connect with others (via the internet, that is), talk to doctors, record their activities, etc.

It can also be programmed to clean floors, watch for intruders and remind patients to take their meds.

Roaches follow their robo-leader


Any port in the storm: Robots can make good leaders for roaches, European researchers have found. These roaches followed their cybernetic overlords to shelter–this time.

by Mark Baard

A group of European scientists will report in the Nov. 16 issue of Science that cockroaches are as likely to follow a robot leader as they are another cockroach.

“Individuals, natural or artificial, are perceived as equivalent,” the report says. “Even when in the minority, robots can modulate the collective decision-making process and produce a global pattern.”

The lead researchers in the “robo-roach leader” study suggest their results might provide further insights into group and collective behavior.

The sick and elderly: first targets for chipping

This won’t hurt a bit. (At least, you won’t remember.)

An Alzheimer’s care facility in Florida will implant RFID tags into its patients, to help identify them in case they stray from “campus.”

Of course, it’s unlikely anyone who finds these test subjects wandering along the road will even think to scan them. Still, ABC News lapped it up.

Dozens of diabetics in Boston and Georgia have also been implanted with the subcutaneous RFID chips made by VeriChip.

The ABC News piece leading RFID opponent Katherine Albrecht. I have written extensively about Albrecht for Wired News and the Boston Globe.

Albrecht is an avowed Christian who believes that RFID tags (or arfids) may be a precursor to the Mark of the Beast described in the Book of Revelation. It’s an inconvenient angle for mainstream reporters, which, when the reporters quote her, invariably leave out of the story.

Personal note:

My relationship with Albrecht became strained after a Wired News editor reworded certain passages in my writeup of Spychips, a book Albrecht co-authored, and which includes quotes from me.

The Wired News editor wanted the piece to appear more skeptical of Albrecht’s book. He also tagged it as a review (under my byline), which it was never intended to be.

I regret not protesting the “review” tag at that time.